First Testing of my 3-Part Game

MiningGame_1st_Close

I had a chance this week to test out the idea for the 3-part game I’ve been working on about mining and railroads. The first part was a fully playable prototype with the rules mostly firmed up. The second part had all the components at least functional, but not all of the rules were ready. We tried both games with mixed results.

MiningGame_1st_WideThe first one was functional (as expected from the more complete nature of the prototype). By the end, it became apparent that one player (me) couldn’t possible win, because selling resources would be blocked. And the intended mechanic of riding the elevators up and down wasn’t important at all. I think I can fix both of those at the same time by having goods get sold only when you ride the elevator up. That way you can’t be blocked, and you have to keep traveling back and forth to make it work.

My next goal is to figure out how to make each play of the mining game different. I’ll write a post about what I mean, but the short version is that it looks like most of my games will play out the same way, with some variation in luck from game to game, but there isn’t enough variation to make the choices interesting from game to game. Accomplishing that is going to be a challenge, especially without growing the number of pieces too much or making the game overly complicated. A deck of cards seems like a big addition at this point, but it may open up a lot of gameplay possibilities.

TTrainGame_1st_Closehe second game wasn’t quite as successful. I think part of the problem is that towns were too close to each other, so you were doing something on every turn. The second problem is that there isn’t any real struggle. There is no competition for deliveries or running trains on the same track. There is no reason not to attempt the closest delivery on every single turn, so the player has no real choices about overall strategy. I need to reexamine some other pick up and deliver games to see how they do it. Or I can make the game more development based, and potentially add some more interesting conflict there.

Overall, the concept seems to work so far. If nothing else, this has been a good exercise in simplifying components. But at least I know it’s worth continuing to develop these ideas, and that’s really what a first playtest is all about.

Advertisements
  1. #1 by NE1 on February 21, 2014 - 7:08 pm

    Neat post. The first game looks almost looks like a micro game from the components shown (like tiny kingdoms). I like the idea of a mining game. You mention elevators, are there carts to carry stuff as well? (I realize that may not make any sense in context of your game.)

    • #2 by Oakleaf Games on February 21, 2014 - 7:40 pm

      It is almost like a set of micro games. I wanted to do something a little bigger, but it’s not worth it to add a bunch of pieces just for one small game. So I figured getting multiple games that use the exact same pieces makes it worth it.
      No mine carts yet, but that might be a good way to force players to keep shipping.

  2. #3 by Brian on February 23, 2014 - 9:59 am

    Are these games connected somehow narratively or is it just 3 games with the same components? In other words, when you finish the first game does something carry over into the next game?

    • #4 by Oakleaf Games on February 23, 2014 - 10:25 am

      Potentially, but I haven’t figured enough of the game to know what it should be. Maybe a little extra money to start with, but having some other choices would be more interesting. For now, they are only tied loosely through the theme, but I would like to improve that, too.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: